The Commandant describes the current manpower system as lacking in the CPG, but never addresses how to improve this system in Force Design. The CPG dedicates an entire page to manpower with the Commandant stating, “I will communicate more on this idea in the near future.” Force Design 2030, the first guidance since the CPG, depicts drastic manpower reductions using the word “manpower” only once and absent from the document is the word “management”. Military service is a welcomed voluntary challenge for many, but ignoring current inefficiencies in the manpower system questions the importance the Marine Corps places on manpower and retention. How does the Marine Corps manage the force of the future? More importantly, how does the Marine Corps compete within the manpower domain, both now and in the future, with analog technology in a digital world? ” Extensive force modernization discussions exist, but little exists on how to modernize an antiquated manpower management system to unleash the full potential of this force. The Commandant’s Planning Guidance (CPG) discusses manpower reductions generating funding for a modern force balancing rising technology costs, “If provided the opportunity to secure additional modernization dollars in exchange for force structure, I am prepared to do so. James Wesley Marsh Center (Headquarters Marine Corps, Manpower & Reserve Affairs- Image cleared for public release)Īll of our investments in data science, machine learning, and artificial intelligence are designed to unleash the incredible talent of the individual Marine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |